Search

Linda Tjelle

Bellevue, WA
0.0 year-end
56 matches · 35W–21L · seasons 20192023
Where Linda sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Linda is one of 0 women at 0.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Linda has been 4.0 for all 5 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

3.54.020192020202120222023

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2023 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Linda has gone from the 50th to the 17th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2022.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
4.0
40%
8W–12L · 45.4% of games
8.0
82.4%
14W–3L · 63.4% of games
7.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
77.8%
7W–2L · 57.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history56 matches
L
2023-02-18 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kay Almer
0.013below expectation — took 33% of games against 42% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
TRANG TRAN / Jamie Williams
2023-01-29 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Edna Kainz
0.053below expectation — took 29% of games against 56% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
Mark Pavlovic / Angela Hallmixed
2022-06-25 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Erich Mock
+0.000about as expected — took 60% of games against 62% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
2022-05-29 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim Martin
+0.014better than expected — took 67% of games against 58% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
2022-05-22 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim Martin
+0.004about as expected — took 44% of games against 43% expected
7-5, 7-6
L
2022-03-05 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Kutz
0.006below expectation — took 35% of games against 40% expected
6-2, 7-5
L
2022-02-11 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim Martin
0.042below expectation — took 25% of games against 48% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
2022-01-09 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim Martin
0.036below expectation — took 41% of games against 57% expected
6-3, 7-6
W
2021-12-04 · #1 Doubles · with Marie Michigami
+0.045better than expected — took 86% of games against 59% expected
6-2, 6-0
W
N/A
2021-11-19 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sue Vrana
0.058about as expected — took 100% of games against 96% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
2021-10-16 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Marie Michigami
+0.006better than expected — took 75% of games against 65% expected
6-4, 6-0
L
Lora Mason / Sue Matyas
2021-10-09 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ellen Murphy
0.019below expectation — took 33% of games against 44% expected
6-2, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.