← Search

Oscar Polo

Portland, OR
0.0 year-end
35 matches · 17W–18L · seasons 2019–2020
Where Oscar sits
65
2.5
683
3.0
1159
3.5
856
4.0
395
4.5
67
5.0

Oscar is one of 0 men at 0.0 in this cohort of 3225. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for men only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Oscar has been a steady 3.5 across all 2 seasons on record.

3.03.520192020

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.5
44.4%
4W–5L · 44.3% of games
7.0
62.5%
5W–3L · 57.1% of games
7.0mixed
40%
6W–9L · 43.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history35 matches
L
Alex Harbell / Richard Clark
2020-03-08 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mike Baker
−0.015below expectation — took 39% of games against 47% expected
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
Debbie Wager / Jason Moore-Greenkemixed
2020-03-06 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Amy Thomas
+0.000about as expected — took 33% of games against 36% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
Bernie Bottomly / John Baker
2020-02-16 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeffrey Metke
+0.011about as expected — took 47% of games against 44% expected
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W
James White / John White
2020-02-01 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robert Gettle
+0.050better than expected — took 59% of games against 39% expected
6-4, 7-5
L
2020-01-24 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Amy Thomas
+0.000about as expected — took 35% of games against 36% expected
6-2, 7-5
L
2020-01-12 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brent Fleck
−0.034below expectation — took 28% of games against 46% expected
7-5, 6-0
L
2019-11-23 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mike Baker
−0.020below expectation — took 46% of games against 54% expected
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
2019-11-17 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Amy Thomas
+0.000below expectation — took 25% of games against 39% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
2019-11-16 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sam Haley
+0.016better than expected — took 71% of games against 60% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
Kirk Planck / Anthony Kershaw
2019-11-10 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ken Pacioni
+0.014better than expected — took 67% of games against 58% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
2019-11-02 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Amy Thomas
+0.000about as expected — took 35% of games against 39% expected
4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
Jessica Khalili / Barzin Khalilimixed
2019-10-27 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Diane Macdonald
+0.000better than expected — took 48% of games against 31% expected
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.