Melissa Gibson
Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Fishers, IN
193 matches · 70W–123L · seasons 2018–2025
Match history193 matches
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2019–2025
CIN A40 3.5W SA IRCD Flaniken
CIN A40 4.0W TU IRCD Gibson
1. Credits
CIN Indianapolis, A40&O 3.5 W, Flaniken (IRC-D)
CIN Indianapolis, Combo 7.5 W, Cook (IRC-D)
CIN Indianapolis, A18&O 3.5 W, Flaniken (IRC-D)
CIN Indianapolis, A18&O 3.5 W, Flaniken (IRC-D)
CIN Indianapolis, A18&O 4.0 W, Gibson (IRC-D)
CIN Indianapolis, A18&O 4.0 W, Gibson (IRC-D)
CIN Indianapolis, A40&O 3.5 W, Flaniken (IRC-D)
CIN Indianapolis, Combo 7.5 X, Cook (IRC-D)
CIN Indianapolis, M18&O 7.0, Cook (IRC-D)
CIN Indianapolis, M18&O 7.0, Cook (IRC-D)
CIN Indianapolis, M40&O 7.0, Cook (IRC-D)
CIN Indianapolis, A18&O 3.5 W, Flaniken (IRC-D)
CIN Indianapolis, A18&O 4.0 W, Gibson (IRC-D)
CIN Indianapolis, A18&O 4.0 W, Gibson (IRC-D)
CIN Indianapolis, A40&O 3.5 W, Flaniken (IRC-D)
CIN Indianapolis, A40&O 3.5 W, Flaniken (IRC-D)
CIN Indianapolis, A40&O 4.0 W, Gibson (IRC-D)
CIN Indianapolis, Combo 7.5 X, Cook (IRC-D)
CIN Indianapolis, Doubles 4.0, Gibson (IRC-D)
CIN Indianapolis, GAP 3.5 W, Flaniken (IRC-D)
CIN Indianapolis, M18&O 8.0, Cook (IRC-D)
CIN Indianapolis, M18&O 8.0, Cook (IRC-D)
CIN Indianapolis, M40&O 7.0, Cook (IRC-D)
CIN Indianapolis, M40&O 7.0, Cook (IRC-D)
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
53.2%
41W–36L · 51.6% of games
4.0
14.9%
7W–40L · 34.4% of games
7.0
42.9%
3W–4L · 46% of games
7.5
25%
3W–9L · 41.3% of games
7.0mixed
34.3%
12W–23L · 45% of games
7.5mixed
27.3%
3W–8L · 41% of games
8.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 47.5% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
67 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
63 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
30 matches
#1 Singles
14%
26 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
4 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.