← Search

Joslyn Jackson

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Ypsilanti, MI
4.5C year-end 2023
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
99 matches · 79W–20L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history99 matches
W
N/A
2026-07-08 · CHIP-Formicola 18s 4.5 NW F · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Frances Carlson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-01 · CHIP-Formicola 18s 4.5 NW F · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Natalie Guo
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-06-25 · CHIP-Formicola 18s 4.5 NW F · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Anne-Marie Kim
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-06-10 · CHIP-Formicola 18s 4.5 NW F · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Leigh Formicola
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-05-27 · CHIP-Formicola 18s 4.5 NW F · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Natalie Guo
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-05-20 · CHIP-Formicola 18s 4.5 NW F · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Leigh Formicola
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L
2023-08-23 · 3CHIP-BENOIT TRI-LEVEL W AUG 454035 SEM F1 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Hannah Pianko
loading the estimate
1-6, 5-7
L
2023-08-14 · 3CHIP-BENOIT TRI-LEVEL W AUG 454035 SEM F1 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kristin Stein
loading the estimate
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2023-07-19 · 4CHIP-FORMICOLA AD18&O 45NW WED SEM · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kusull Kim
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
W
2023-06-28 · 4CHIP-FORMICOLA AD18&O 45NW WED SEM · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Meredith Moore
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-0
W
2023-05-31 · 4CHIP-FORMICOLA AD18&O 45NW WED SEM · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Meredith Moore
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
W
2023-03-25 · 2CHIP-FORMICOLA SEM Tri-Level Showdown W 958575 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Christina Slade
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level14 levels played
0.0
100%
5W–0L · 75.3% of games
3.5
85.7%
6W–1L · 75.2% of games
4.0
73.1%
19W–7L · 63.8% of games
4.5
66.7%
10W–5L · 63.4% of games
6.5
75%
3W–1L · 54.4% of games
7.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
100%
9W–0L · 64.9% of games
8.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.5
75%
3W–1L · 70.8% of games
9.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
70%
7W–3L · 63% of games
7.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
100%
5W–0L · 65.4% of games
9.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 54% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
36 matches
#1 Doubles
34%
34 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
21 matches
#1 Singles
3%
3 matches
#1 Female Doubles
2%
2 matches
#1 Female Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams