Search

Douglas Smith

Seattle, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
35 matches · 16W–19L · seasons 20192025
Where Douglas sits
79
2.5
852
3.0
1347
3.5
980
4.0
435
4.5
80
5.0

Douglas is one of 1347 men at 3.5 in this cohort of 3773. Levels at or below 3.5 account for 60% of them. Shown for men only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Douglas has played at 4.0, 3.5 across 5 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

3.03.54.020192020202120222025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2022, 2025 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Douglas has gone from the 40th to the 5th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2020.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
4.0
37.5%
9W–15L · 45.2% of games
8.0
85.7%
6W–1L · 65.6% of games
8.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history35 matches
L
2025-02-22 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Peter Wachter
0.010below expectation — took 40% of games against 45% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
2025-02-01 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrew Russin
0.072below expectation — took 29% of games against 62% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
Irvin MacQuarrie / Jayden Yoo
2025-01-11 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Peter Wachter
0.030below expectation — took 38% of games against 53% expected
6-3, 7-5
L
2025-01-05 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Peter Wachter
0.027below expectation — took 39% of games against 52% expected
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2022-02-06 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Gravenkemper
0.007below expectation — took 25% of games against 35% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
Marian Stanescu / Amit Rajkhowa
2022-01-22 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Doug Skrobut
+0.008about as expected — took 35% of games against 36% expected
7-6, 6-1
W
Rich Gacer / Deepak Rao
2022-01-08 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Gravenkemper
+0.037better than expected — took 67% of games against 48% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
Michael Hafkey / Paul Almondchamps
2021-10-22 · #1 Doubles · with John Cunningham
0.009about as expected — took 42% of games against 47% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2021-08-08 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Katie McReynolds
+0.000below expectation — took 60% of games against 68% expected
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
2021-06-19 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chris Andrews
+0.066better than expected — took 86% of games against 50% expected
6-0, 6-2
L
Matt Bruer / Djelli Berisha
2021-06-12 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with William Hall
+0.011about as expected — took 37% of games against 36% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
Zhiheng Zhu / Bradford Chen
2021-05-09 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Gravenkemper
+0.080better than expected — took 72% of games against 37% expected
7-5, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.