← Search

Linda de Gomez

Las Vegas, NV
0.0 year-end
57 matches · 24W–33L · seasons 2019–2022
Where Linda sits
145
2.5
1349
3.0
1627
3.5
1052
4.0
435
4.5
70
5.0

Linda is one of 0 women at 0.0 in this cohort of 4678. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Linda has been 3.0 for all 4 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

2.53.02019202020212022

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Linda has gone from the 82nd to the 31st percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2022.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
3.0
43.4%
23W–30L · 49.9% of games
6.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 39.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history57 matches
W
2022-03-05 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Yves Tremblay-Barris
+0.060better than expected — took 59% of games against 36% expected
7-5, 6-4
W
N/A
2022-02-12 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Josie Duncan
+0.108better than expected — took 100% of games against 44% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
Lori LaBarbera / Racquel Toyozaki
2022-01-22 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ann Shah
−0.009below expectation — took 29% of games against 38% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
Sunny Glendon / EMELIA ALLEN
2022-01-15 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Robin Gordon
+0.017about as expected — took 25% of games against 28% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
2022-01-08 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Yves Tremblay-Barris
−0.028below expectation — took 38% of games against 52% expected
7-6, 6-2
L
Stephaney Lavigne / Talia Galvez
2021-11-13 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rochelle Hamatian
−0.024below expectation — took 41% of games against 52% expected
6-4, 7-5
L
2021-10-30 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rochelle Hamatian
+0.022below expectation — took 8% of games against 14% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
Jill Kreston / Susan Edwards
2021-10-16 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Bethany Pullano
−0.041below expectation — took 29% of games against 51% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
2021-09-08 · #3 Female Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Wooldridge
−0.002about as expected — took 43% of games against 44% expected
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L
Destiny McDoniel / Lisa Forster
2021-08-09 · #3 Female Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Olson
−0.045below expectation — took 46% of games against 62% expected
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
2021-07-19 · #3 Female Doubles · 3.0 · with Lisa Schnitz
−0.062below expectation — took 29% of games against 59% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
Kathleen Richardson / Francie Angelov
2021-05-15 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shellene Goudge
+0.009about as expected — took 50% of games against 47% expected
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.