← Search

Jill McCampbell

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Fishers, IN
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
37 matches · 15W–22L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history37 matches
L
2026-07-16 · Indy A40 3.0W CSWC Hackney · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sue Spicer
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-25 · Indy A40 3.0W CSWC Hackney · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Donna Rizzo
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-11 · Indy A40 3.0W CSWC Hackney · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Donna Rizzo
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-06-04 · Indy A40 3.0W CSWC Hackney · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Janice Ringo
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-05-14 · Indy A40 3.0W CSWC Hackney · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christine Oakley
loading the estimate
7-5, 5-3
W
Default
2026-05-07 · Indy A40 3.0W CSWC Hackney · #1 Singles · 3.0
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2025-08-04 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lisa Kempsell
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-1
L
2025-07-28 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Suzy Maher
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 4-6
L
2025-06-16 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lisa Kempsell
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 2-6
W
2024-08-12 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sue Nonweiler
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
L
2024-07-29 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Julie Scheaffer
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
L
2024-07-08 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kelley Holden
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams1 team
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
46.2%
12W–14L · 47.7% of games
6.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 45.6% of games
7.0
20%
1W–4L · 42.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
35%
13 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
2 matches
#1 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams