Search

Benjamin Reim

Seattle, WA
0.0 year-end
40 matches · 19W–21L · seasons 20192023
Where Benjamin sits
79
2.5
852
3.0
1347
3.5
980
4.0
435
4.5
80
5.0

Benjamin is one of 0 men at 0.0 in this cohort of 3773. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for men only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Benjamin has been a steady 3.5 across all 5 seasons on record.

3.03.520192020202120222023

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2022, 2023 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.5
50%
13W–13L · 48.8% of games
7.0mixed
40%
4W–6L · 49.7% of games
8.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 43.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history40 matches
W
2023-05-28 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Thomas Kaghan
0.035below expectation — took 50% of games against 64% expected
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2023-05-21 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Raghav Goyal
0.046below expectation — took 20% of games against 45% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
2022-06-05 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kaustav Kundu
0.006about as expected — took 48% of games against 52% expected
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L
2022-04-16 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeremy MacVicar
0.016below expectation — took 25% of games against 38% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2022-04-08 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeremy MacVicar
0.049below expectation — took 32% of games against 55% expected
6-1, 7-5
W
James Milton Smith / Rana Muminoglumixed
2021-10-08 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Emily Hawkins
+0.000better than expected — took 75% of games against 60% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
Dean Ciano / Forest Dickey
2021-07-03 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tyson Hawkins
0.008about as expected — took 44% of games against 48% expected
7-6, 3-2
W
2021-06-27 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Uday Sangar
+0.027better than expected — took 71% of games against 56% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
2021-05-21 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tyson Hawkins
+0.014better than expected — took 71% of games against 60% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
2021-05-09 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ajay Radhakrishnan
0.008about as expected — took 48% of games against 50% expected
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2020-10-18 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kimberly McCallum
+0.000below expectation — took 29% of games against 52% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
2020-09-26 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marian Joh
+0.000better than expected — took 45% of games against 35% expected
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.