← Search

Valerie Chloupek

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Chicago, IL
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
18 matches · 8W–10L · seasons 2024–2026
Match history18 matches
L
2026-10-25 · CHI E 18W3.5 8.ACN Bergman Sun 5 $24 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tess McElhiney
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-4
L
2026-10-18 · CHI E 18W3.5 8.ACN Bergman Sun 5 $24 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cassandra Montoya
loading the estimate
6-7, 2-4
L
2026-05-04 · CDTA W 18&OW4.0 9.Nielsen Bergman Sun 5 $22 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Morgan Carr
loading the estimate
6-7, 5-3, 0-1
L
2026-04-18 · CDTA W TriWLo 1.RT Ford Sat 2 $27 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rachel Fuller
loading the estimate
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-04 · CDTA W 18&OW4.0 9.Nielsen Bergman Sun 5 $22 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rachel Orlowski
loading the estimate
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-22 · CDTA W 18&OW4.0 9.Nielsen Bergman Sun 5 $22 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rachel Orlowski
loading the estimate
4-6, 5-4, 0-1
L
2026-02-28 · CDTA W TriWLo 1.RT Ford Sat 2 $27 · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Suzanne Losasso
loading the estimate
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-02-21 · CDTA W 18&OW4.0 9.Nielsen Bergman Sun 5 $22 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rachel Fuller
loading the estimate
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-02-15 · CDTA W 18&OW4.0 9.Nielsen Bergman Sun 5 $22 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rachel Fuller
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-02-01 · CDTA W 18&OW4.0 9.Nielsen Bergman Sun 5 $22 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nancy Manolis
loading the estimate
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W
2025-03-16 · CDTA W 55&OW7.0 1.MT Chi Brown Fri 7 $31.5 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jean Sawin
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
W
2025-03-15 · CDTA W TriW30.35.40 3.River Trails Fuller Sat 2 $26 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elise Bergman
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams6 teams · 2024–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 57.8% of games
4.0
16.7%
1W–5L · 48.7% of games
7.0
75%
3W–1L · 66.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 44% of the time
#2 Doubles
44%
8 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams