Search

Tracie Chang

Las Vegas, NV
4.0C year-end 2025
123 matches · 64W–59L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.46
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 6 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
68%
down to 3.5
32%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5
Projected to December: 43% down · 57% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.51. Higher than today’s 3.46 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 4.0
119 of 129
NV · 4.0
183 of 203

Tracie is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Tracie has been 4.0 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

3.54.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Tracie has gone from the 70th to the 68th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
4.0
54.4%
56W–47L · 51.7% of games
8.0
53.8%
7W–6L · 57% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history123 matches
L
2026-05-14 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nancy Unglaub
0.012below expectation — took 41% of games against 47% expected
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-23 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Elizabeth McManus
0.009about as expected — took 45% of games against 49% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-02-14 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anahi Sanchez
0.013below expectation — took 52% of games against 58% expected
7-5, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-02-07 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brandi Leedham-Erwin
+0.030better than expected — took 48% of games against 39% expected
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L
Sonia Vermeys / Maria Gonzales
2026-01-31 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth McManus
+0.007about as expected — took 47% of games against 44% expected
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-01-03 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anahi Sanchez
0.056below expectation — took 14% of games against 45% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
2025-05-22 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Susan Castelli
0.001below expectation — took 29% of games against 36% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
Barbara Fair / Kathy Kelbel
2025-05-15 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Elizabeth McManus
0.012about as expected — took 52% of games against 55% expected
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
K C Scherrer / Maryann Goodsell
2025-04-03 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Anna Bishop
0.006about as expected — took 41% of games against 45% expected
7-6, 6-3
W
Nicole Medas / Mimi Liu
2025-03-08 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jacqueline Marquiz
+0.004better than expected — took 71% of games against 64% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
Lan Duong / Gayl Fitzgerald
2025-03-01 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth McManus
+0.007about as expected — took 50% of games against 46% expected
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L
Larissa Tomlin / Denise Antoniadis
2025-02-22 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anna Bishop
0.035below expectation — took 29% of games against 48% expected
6-4, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.