← Search

Chloe Diskin

Las Vegas, NV
4.5C year-end 2023
72 matches · 63W–9L · seasons 2022–2023
Where Chloe sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Chloe is one of 423 women at 4.5 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 4.5 account for 98% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Chloe has been 4.5 for all 2 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

4.04.520222023

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.5, Chloe has gone from the 99th to the 99th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2023.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level7 levels played
4.0
88.9%
8W–1L · 72.5% of games
4.5
86.7%
13W–2L · 71.1% of games
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
88.9%
8W–1L · 66.1% of games
8.5mixed
100%
10W–0L · 68.2% of games
9.0mixed
80%
8W–2L · 63.1% of games
9.5mixed
80%
4W–1L · 56.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history72 matches
L
Lindsey White / Katherine Olivier
2023-08-25 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Monique Richards
−0.003about as expected — took 52% of games against 52% expected
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
Lauren Spainchamps
2023-08-12 · #1 Singles
+0.007better than expected — took 71% of games against 63% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
Victoria Taitchamps
2023-08-11 · #2 Singles
−0.015about as expected — took 60% of games against 63% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
Lisa Sterbenz / Veronica O'Brienchamps
2023-08-11 · #3 Doubles · with Angeline Stecia
−0.002about as expected — took 60% of games against 59% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
2023-08-04 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Monique Richards
−0.004about as expected — took 48% of games against 49% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2023-07-21 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Monique Richards
+0.032better than expected — took 61% of games against 46% expected
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
Emily Adamschamps
2023-06-14 · #1 Singles
+0.034better than expected — took 80% of games against 59% expected
6-3, 6-0
W
2023-06-12 · #2 Doubles · with Ariana Stanciu
−0.009about as expected — took 67% of games against 65% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Julieanna Edge / Stephanie Chen
2023-06-03 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Monique Richards
−0.003better than expected — took 75% of games against 68% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
2023-06-01 · #3 Doubles · with Thomas Cunningham
+0.023better than expected — took 80% of games against 63% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
Allen Morgan / Lucy Twohymixed
2023-05-21 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Vitaly Pecharsky
+0.000better than expected — took 67% of games against 44% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
2023-05-14 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Thomas Cunningham
+0.000about as expected — took 67% of games against 66% expected
6-3, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.