← Search

Abigail Hellwig

— year-end
24 matches · 16W–8L · seasons 2019–2022

Captains: add Abigail Hellwig to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history24 matches
W
2022-04-01 · C 6.5W B LT Galehouse · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Alissa McKenzie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2022-03-25 · C 6.5W B LT Galehouse · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Alissa McKenzie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
L
2021-10-22 · C 6.5W LT Banas · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Anne Lubinski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2021-10-15 · C 6.5W LT Banas · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Laura Breiding
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2021-10-01 · C 6.5W LT Banas · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Hannah Banas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2019-11-17 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Selena Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2019-11-10 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Alicia Blessing
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2019-11-03 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Alicia Blessing
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2019-10-27 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Casye Hammer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2019-09-22 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Alicia Blessing
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
Vivette Saccone / Dana Wobser
2019-07-22 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christa Galehouse
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2019-07-15 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christa Galehouse
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
Teams2 teams · 2021–2022
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
75%
6W–2L · 55.2% of games
6.5
60%
3W–2L · 47.6% of games
7.5
80%
4W–1L · 64.8% of games
8.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 55.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 63% of the time
#1 Doubles
63%
15 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
5 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal