Search

John Collier

SNOHOMISH, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
68 matches · 22W–46L · seasons 20192025
Where John sits
73
2.5
775
3.0
1278
3.5
930
4.0
419
4.5
77
5.0

John is one of 775 men at 3.0 in this cohort of 3552. Levels at or below 3.0 account for 24% of them. Shown for men only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

John has been a steady 3.0 across all 5 seasons on record.

2.53.020192020202120222025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2025 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, John has gone from the 17th to the 7th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2022.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
3.0
34.6%
9W–17L · 44.7% of games
3.5
16.7%
1W–5L · 35.1% of games
6.0
20%
1W–4L · 42% of games
7.0
45.5%
5W–6L · 48.8% of games
6.0mixed
18.2%
2W–9L · 39.2% of games
7.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history68 matches
W
Mihai Popoaei / Zhe Zhang
2025-05-24 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mark Seko
+0.039better than expected — took 67% of games against 47% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
Chen Hsu / JR Rabago
2025-05-03 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kim Smith
0.026below expectation — took 33% of games against 47% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
Kevin Jeong / Rajesh Sugumaran
2025-04-12 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sean McCarron
+0.005below expectation — took 25% of games against 31% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2022-09-24 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Martin Ruscha
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-3, 6-4
W
Hasnain Syed / James Hornsby
2022-09-17 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Charles Kim
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-1, 6-3
L
2022-03-11 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kim Smith
0.036below expectation — took 20% of games against 41% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
Patrick Lamoria / Matthew Carter
2022-02-19 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kim Smith
+0.021better than expected — took 53% of games against 44% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
Alec Cooper / Patrick Brem
2022-02-13 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kim Smith
0.018below expectation — took 33% of games against 44% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
2022-02-06 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kim Smith
0.017below expectation — took 32% of games against 42% expected
6-1, 7-5
L
Kresimir Grgurevic / Terry Wilson
2022-01-22 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kim Smith
0.017below expectation — took 41% of games against 49% expected
6-4, 7-5
L
2022-01-15 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joseph Calacat
+0.007about as expected — took 33% of games against 35% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
2021-11-27 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lisa Gluth
+0.000better than expected — took 67% of games against 35% expected
6-3, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.