← Search

Charles Kim

Bothell, WA
0.0 year-end
83 matches · 37W–46L · seasons 2019–2023
Where Charles sits
65
2.5
683
3.0
1159
3.5
856
4.0
395
4.5
67
5.0

Charles is one of 0 men at 0.0 in this cohort of 3225. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for men only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Charles has been 4.0 for all 5 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

3.54.020192020202120222023

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Charles has gone from the 42nd to the 66th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2022.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
4.0
47.2%
17W–19L · 52.7% of games
7.0
87.5%
7W–1L · 65% of games
8.0
26.7%
4W–11L · 43% of games
7.0mixed
43.8%
7W–9L · 50.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history83 matches
W
Tom Clemente / Vivek Balaji
2023-01-28 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Bibbs
−0.014below expectation — took 52% of games against 58% expected
6-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
Brad Teeter / Daniel Stewart
2023-01-07 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Daniel Yoon
+0.073better than expected — took 63% of games against 34% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
2022-11-20 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Daniel Martin
−0.027below expectation — took 33% of games against 48% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
Christopher Rink / David Jacobsen
2022-11-05 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Bruce Morrison
−0.012below expectation — took 29% of games against 39% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
Hasnain Syed / James Hornsby
2022-09-17 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with John Collier
+0.009better than expected — took 75% of games against 64% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
Mark Henninger / James Day
2022-09-11 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Daniel Martin
+0.027better than expected — took 63% of games against 50% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
2022-09-09 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Robert Gascoigne
−0.024below expectation — took 29% of games against 44% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
N/A
2022-08-13 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bob Strickland
−0.099about as expected — took 100% of games against 96% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
2022-07-25 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lohit Verma
−0.023below expectation — took 48% of games against 57% expected
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L
2022-06-04 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Peter Kim-Himmelfarb
+0.011about as expected — took 45% of games against 41% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Ken Tian / In Su Park
2022-05-08 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julian Robles
+0.023better than expected — took 67% of games against 54% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
2022-05-07 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Peter Kim-Himmelfarb
+0.017about as expected — took 41% of games against 37% expected
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.