Teams

CAC/SL-55 Stanley

2021 Adult 55 & Over · 8.0 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.62 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2020-11-07vs STC-SladehammerLost 12
L#1 DoublesRay Heitzman / Martin Ruscha vs Michael Steele / Kevin Young5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMatt Moon / Robert Gascoigne vs Robert Sheppard / Vincent La Cava4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesMichael Jaffe / Wayne Stead vs John Ferry / Matthew Barnes6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesMartin Ruscha / Michael Jaffe vs John Follis / James Shields7-5, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesRobert Gascoigne / Matt Moon vs Bindu Purhar / Phillip Sabin7-6, 6-7, 1-0
2020-10-11vs MC-Hammer Heads 3Won 21
W#1 DoublesRay Heitzman / Matt Moon vs Howard Shalinsky / Jonathan Hendrix6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMichael Jaffe / Daniel Murray vs James Gunther / Thomas Isarankura4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesColin Bronemann / Chris Lloyd vs Frank Hammer / Terry Ward2-6, 2-6
2020-10-04vs RBW-Bowen/MarshLost 12
L#1 DoublesDaniel Murray / Michael Jaffe vs David Pogue / Vincent Yee2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesCharles Kim / Matt Moon vs Arthur Lum / Stephen Peringer6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesColin Bronemann / Chris Lloyd vs Bruce Colley / BOB BOWEN6-7, 4-6
2020-09-26vs BC-ClementeLost 12
W#1 DoublesMartin Ruscha / Ray Heitzman vs Laine Tsujii / Jim Tjelle6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesThomas Stanley / Daniel Murray vs Alan Fulp / Kurt Larson6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesChris Lloyd / Colin Bronemann vs Race McKee / Gregory Olsen3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2020-09-19vs WSC-CarlsonLost 12
W#1 DoublesDaniel Murray / Ray Heitzman vs Thomas Bombeli / Stuart Cobb6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesThomas Stanley / Charles Kim vs David Higginbotham / George Bond3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesRobert Gascoigne / Chris Lloyd vs Steve Eggerman / Michael Carlson6-7, 6-6
2020-09-13vs HBSQ-CoghlanLost 03
L#1 DoublesMartin Ruscha / Ray Heitzman vs Wolf Yeigh / William Cohon1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Jaffe / Matt Moon vs Robin Kearsley / Mick Horton4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesThomas Stanley / Charles Kim vs Jim Coghlan / Daniel Rutter3-6, 3-6
2020-09-05vs BETC-HoefelLost 12
L#1 DoublesRay Heitzman / Wayne Stead vs Brian Porter / Carlos Lacayo6-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesCharles Kim / Robert Gascoigne vs Scott Gunderson / Mike Hoefel2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesDaniel Murray / Michael Jaffe vs Bill Houser / Martin Chang6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · 8.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1STC-Sladehammer6217714170
2WSC-Carlson62131124225
3MC-Hammer Heads 353131124206
4CAC/SL-Early Risers Silver Lake-Shields53141025202
5BETC-Hoefel35111329242
6RBW-Bowen/Marsh2671734259
7CAC/SL-55 Stanley1781635252

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Matt Moon
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.71
Daniel Murray
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.67
Martin Ruscha
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
Robert Gascoigne
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.24
Wayne Stead
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.15
Thomas Stanley
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.00
Colin Bronemann
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.85
Chris Lloyd
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Charles Kim
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 0
Ray Heitzman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 0
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Daniel Murray + Matt Moon4352% games+2.7% vs expected
Daniel Murray + Martin Ruscha5353% games−0.4% vs expected
Martin Ruscha + Ray Heitzman9848% games−0.6% vs expected
Matt Moon + Wayne Stead7456% gamesnot enough data
Colin Bronemann + Chris Lloyd0836% gamesnot enough data
Daniel Murray + Chris Lloyd4160% gamesnot enough data
Daniel Murray + Thomas Stanley224 matchesnot enough data
Martin Ruscha + Thomas Stanley134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Matt Moon
27W–37L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Daniel Murray
43W–37L career · 5 lines in 2021
5%93%1%
3.71
4
Martin Ruscha
102W–57L career · 8 lines in 2021
10%89%1%
3.67
3.5
Robert Gascoigne
35W–49L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Wayne Stead
37W–36L career · 4 lines in 2021
3%95%2%
3.24
3.5
Thomas Stanley
11W–22L career · type S · 3 lines in 2021
12%88%<1%
3.15
3.5
Colin Bronemann
32W–47L career · 3 lines in 2021
49%51%<1%
3.00
3
Chris Lloyd
10W–31L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%87%13%
2.85
0
Charles Kim
37W–46L career · 7 lines in 2021
not enough data
0
Ray Heitzman
24W–16L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.