← Search

Ray Heitzman

Cypress, TX
0.0 year-end
40 matches · 24W–16L · seasons 2019–2021
Where Ray sits
79
2.5
852
3.0
1347
3.5
980
4.0
435
4.5
80
5.0

Ray is one of 0 men at 0.0 in this cohort of 3773. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for men only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Ray has been a steady 4.0 across all 2 seasons on record.

3.54.020192020

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 8.0, Ray has gone from the 29th to the 29th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2021.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
4.0
70.6%
12W–5L · 52.7% of games
8.0
52.6%
10W–9L · 47.2% of games
8.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history40 matches
L
Michael Steele / Kevin Young
2020-11-07 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Martin Ruscha
−0.026below expectation — took 32% of games against 46% expected
7-5, 6-1
W
2020-10-11 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Matt Moon
+0.032better than expected — took 63% of games against 48% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
2020-09-26 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Martin Ruscha
+0.039better than expected — took 67% of games against 47% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
Thomas Bombeli / Stuart Cobb
2020-09-19 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Daniel Murray
−0.047below expectation — took 50% of games against 68% expected
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2020-09-13 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Martin Ruscha
−0.056below expectation — took 14% of games against 45% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
Brian Porter / Carlos Lacayo
2020-09-05 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Wayne Stead
+0.001about as expected — took 43% of games against 44% expected
7-6, 6-4
W
2020-02-14 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mike Samora
+0.030better than expected — took 62% of games against 48% expected
7-6, 6-2
L
Ben Kolpa / Hein Hellemons
2020-01-25 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Martin Ruscha
+0.002about as expected — took 50% of games against 48% expected
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
Tyler Chin / James Wann
2020-01-24 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Martin Ruscha
−0.028below expectation — took 41% of games against 54% expected
7-5, 6-4
W
Ming Cheng / Joe Shen
2020-01-19 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matt Moon
+0.051better than expected — took 86% of games against 57% expected
6-2, 6-0
W
Richard Mar / Jim Rutledge
2020-01-19 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Phu Ngo
−0.010about as expected — took 67% of games against 66% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
2020-01-11 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Martin Ruscha
+0.013better than expected — took 58% of games against 52% expected
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.