Search

Matt Moon

Shoreline, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
64 matches · 27W–37L · seasons 20192025
Where Matt sits
65
2.5
683
3.0
1159
3.5
856
4.0
395
4.5
67
5.0

Matt is one of 856 men at 4.0 in this cohort of 3225. Levels at or below 4.0 account for 86% of them. Shown for men only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Matt has been 4.0 for all 7 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

3.54.02019202020212022202320242025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2024 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 8.0, Matt has gone from the 59th to the 59th percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2022.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
4.0
34.4%
11W–21L · 49.3% of games
8.0
52.4%
11W–10L · 49.6% of games
8.0mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 48.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history64 matches
L
Adam Hrebeniuk / Xia Suterchamps
2025-09-21 · #3 Doubles · with Jennifer Jungmann
0.048below expectation — took 29% of games against 53% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2025-08-17 · #2 Doubles · with Kim Weyer
0.034below expectation — took 25% of games against 44% expected
6-0, 6-4
L
2025-08-09 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tonee Rockwell
+0.000below expectation — took 43% of games against 62% expected
7-6, 6-4
W
2025-06-20 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jennifer Jungmann
+0.000about as expected — took 52% of games against 53% expected
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2025-03-15 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Martin Ruscha
0.003about as expected — took 35% of games against 39% expected
6-0, 6-7, 1-0
W
Marc Cummings / Russ Bucklin
2025-03-09 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kevin Schmidt
+0.057better than expected — took 80% of games against 50% expected
6-0, 6-3
L
2025-02-21 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brian Peters
0.035below expectation — took 35% of games against 52% expected
7-6, 6-1
L
John Medina / Brad Teeter
2025-01-18 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joseph Ching
0.006about as expected — took 50% of games against 52% expected
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
Ronald Mulberg / Jourdan Radloff
2024-01-26 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Deron Dahlke
+0.029better than expected — took 38% of games against 31% expected
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
L
Tom Parrish / David Hwang
2024-01-13 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Daniel Yoon
+0.010about as expected — took 48% of games against 43% expected
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L
2023-02-18 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robert Gascoigne
0.036below expectation — took 25% of games against 45% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Tod Wescott / Peiwei Cao
2023-02-04 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tri Dang
+0.015better than expected — took 50% of games against 45% expected
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.