← Search

Brent Miner

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Burien, WA
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
28 matches · 15W–13L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history28 matches
W
2026-06-03 · BETC-Higashi · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Todd Fauchald
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-05-13 · BETC-Higashi · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Todd Fauchald
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-04-30 · BETC-Higashi · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kevin Donovan
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
L
2024-06-10 · AYTC-Aces@65+ Edwards · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mike Rasanen
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 1-6
L
2024-05-20 · RBW-Aces@GamePoint-Edwards · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with William Razeto
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2024-05-08 · AYTC-Aces@65+ Edwards · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mike Rasanen
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 0-6
L
2024-05-06 · RBW-Aces@GamePoint-Edwards · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Steve Kono
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 0-6, 0-1
L
2023-05-10 · RBW-Aces @ GamePoint-Edwards · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with John Hughes
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 3-6
W
2023-05-09 · RBW-Aces @ GamePoint-Edwards · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with John Hughes
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-4
L
RANDY PASSMAN / Larry Ray
2023-02-05 · RBW-Aces@GamePoint-Edwards · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Don Fleming championship
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 2-6
W
Art McNulty / Richard Hoffman
2023-02-04 · RBW-Aces@GamePoint-Edwards · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with John Hunt championship
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 7-6
L
Steve Honodel / John McManus
2023-02-04 · RBW-Aces@GamePoint-Edwards · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Steve Kono championship
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
6.0
57.7%
15W–11L · 56.2% of games
7.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
36%
10 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams