← Search

Mark Raffinan

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Charlottesville, VA
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
102 matches · 72W–30L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history102 matches
L
2026-07-11 · BHSC - Raffinan - Warhogs · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jay Bolus championship
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-07-10 · BHSC - Raffinan - Warhogs · #1 Singles · 4.5 championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-10 · BHSC - Raffinan - Warhogs · #1 Singles · 4.5 championship
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-13 · BHSC - Raffinan - Warhogs · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Wescott Blemker
loading the estimate
4-6, 5-7
W
N/A
2026-04-27 · BHSC - Raffinan - Warhogs · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with John McNeil
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2025-10-18 · BHSC WarHogs-Cueva · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Robert Cueva championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
W
2025-09-24 · BHSC-Raffinan · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Robert Cueva
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
W
2025-09-19 · Weck - Ballievers 8.5 · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Joan Carlson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 1-6, 1-0
W
N/A
2025-08-22 · Weck - Ballievers 8.5 · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kimberly Glass mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2025-08-16 · BHSC-Raffinan · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Robert Cueva
loading the estimate
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-07-11 · BHSC- Weck · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Lauren Suggs mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 3-6, 0-1
L
2025-06-28 · BHSC- Weck · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Amy Nolasco mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
4.0
86.4%
19W–3L · 63.8% of games
4.5
68.6%
24W–11L · 59.3% of games
8.5
80%
12W–3L · 61.9% of games
7.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
50%
11W–11L · 51.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
40 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
28 matches
#2 Singles
3%
3 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer