← Search

Amy Nolasco

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Crozet, VA
4.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
84 matches · 41W–43L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history84 matches
L
2026-05-17 · Weck - Boar's Head Ballievers · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Brandon Schartz mixed
loading the estimate
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-03 · Weck - Boar's Head Ballievers · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Brandon Schartz mixed
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
W
2025-09-19 · Weck - Ballievers 8.5 · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Thomas Weck mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 1-6, 1-0
W
2025-09-14 · Weck - Ballievers 8.5 · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Lorenzo Davis mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-0
W
2025-07-13 · BHSC- Weck · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Brandon Schartz mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 7-6
L
2025-07-11 · BHSC- Weck · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Brandon Schartz mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 4-6
L
2025-06-28 · BHSC- Weck · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Mark Raffinan mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 5-7
W
2025-06-22 · BHSC- Weck · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Howell Fendley mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-05-16 · BHSC Ballievers-Weck · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Mark Raffinan mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 2-6
W
2025-05-09 · BHSC Ballievers-Weck · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Wescott Blemker mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-4
W
2025-04-27 · BHSC Ballievers-Weck · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Todd Sechser mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-2
W
N/A
2025-04-02 · BHSC Ballievers-Weck · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Mark Raffinan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 43.1% of games
4.5
40%
8W–12L · 48.8% of games
8.5
50%
8W–8L · 49.5% of games
9.5
40%
2W–3L · 40.4% of games
8.0mixed
90%
9W–1L · 62.4% of games
8.5mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 50.4% of games
9.0mixed
47.4%
9W–10L · 48.4% of games
9.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 54% of the time
#1 Doubles
54%
45 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
19 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert