Search

David Mealey

Portland, OR
0.0 year-end
40 matches · 17W–23L · seasons 20192022
Where David sits
65
2.5
683
3.0
1159
3.5
856
4.0
395
4.5
67
5.0

David is one of 0 men at 0.0 in this cohort of 3225. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for men only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

David has been a steady 3.5 across all 2 seasons on record.

3.03.520192022

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2022 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.5
40%
4W–6L · 43.7% of games
7.0
35.7%
5W–9L · 44.8% of games
7.0mixed
50%
8W–8L · 47.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history40 matches
L
2022-04-30 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Masafumi Inoue
0.032below expectation — took 20% of games against 40% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
2022-04-09 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robert Hesslink
0.009below expectation — took 33% of games against 41% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
2020-11-01 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robert Hesslink
+0.080better than expected — took 53% of games against 29% expected
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L
Robert Leitheiser / Jon Mandeville
2020-10-17 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Frank Brown
0.047below expectation — took 46% of games against 63% expected
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
David Williams / Kirk Planck
2020-10-10 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Wes Milligan
0.018below expectation — took 38% of games against 47% expected
6-2, 7-6
L
2020-09-26 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bernie Bottomly
0.024below expectation — took 29% of games against 43% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
2020-03-06 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sheryl Riley
+0.000below expectation — took 25% of games against 43% expected
6-4, 6-0
L
2020-02-09 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sheryl Riley
+0.000below expectation — took 46% of games against 53% expected
7-6, 7-6
L
2020-01-17 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sheryl Riley
+0.000about as expected — took 29% of games against 31% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2019-11-24 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bernie Bottomly
0.023below expectation — took 29% of games against 43% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
2019-11-09 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Charles Wickens
0.023below expectation — took 20% of games against 37% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
2019-11-03 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sheryl Riley
+0.000about as expected — took 50% of games against 47% expected
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.