Search

David Smiley

Vancouver, WA
0.0 year-end
54 matches · 19W–35L · seasons 20192024
Where David sits
65
2.5
683
3.0
1159
3.5
856
4.0
395
4.5
67
5.0

David is one of 0 men at 0.0 in this cohort of 3225. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for men only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Teams40 teams · 2008–2024
CGM-Blunt/Palena
2024 Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0 Mixed
2024
CGM-Logan
2024 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Men
2024
CGM-Reed
2024 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Men
2024
CGM-Logan/Reed
2023 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Men
2023
CGM-Logan
2022 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Men
2022
CGM-Blunt/Knopp
2022 Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0 Mixed
2022
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

David has been a steady 3.5 across all 5 seasons on record.

3.03.520192020202220232024

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2023 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.5
11.8%
2W–15L · 40.7% of games
7.0
42.9%
3W–4L · 44.5% of games
7.0mixed
46.7%
14W–16L · 48.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history54 matches
L
2024-06-08 · CGM-Reed · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kimbal Logan
0.002about as expected — took 43% of games against 44% expected
7-6, 6-4
L
2024-05-19 · CGM-Reed · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Wallin
0.021below expectation — took 33% of games against 45% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Victoria Cartwright / Scott Cartwrightmixed
2023-11-18 · CGM-Blunt/Palena · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Alana Rhea
+0.000below expectation — took 33% of games against 43% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
2023-11-04 · CGM-Logan · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jon Peters
0.041below expectation — took 14% of games against 40% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
2023-10-13 · CGM-Blunt/Palena · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Vicki Blunt
+0.000about as expected — took 65% of games against 61% expected
7-5, 6-2
L
2023-09-24 · CGM-Logan · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Andrew Geisler
+0.016about as expected — took 25% of games against 28% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
2023-09-23 · CGM-Blunt/Palena · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cheryl Geisler
+0.000better than expected — took 59% of games against 47% expected
7-6, 6-3
L
2023-09-16 · CGM-Blunt/Palena · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Vicki Blunt
+0.000below expectation — took 33% of games against 39% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
2023-05-28 · CGM-Logan/Reed · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kimbal Logan
0.045below expectation — took 20% of games against 45% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
2023-05-21 · CGM-Logan/Reed · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kimbal Logan
+0.122better than expected — took 100% of games against 39% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
2023-04-23 · CGM-Logan/Reed · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hayward Reed
0.041below expectation — took 25% of games against 47% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2023-04-08 · CGM-Logan/Reed · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Steve Thunstedt
0.002about as expected — took 43% of games against 45% expected
6-4, 7-6
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.