Search

Amir Tadjedin

Portland, OR
4.0C year-end 2025
43 matches · 24W–19L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.53
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 4 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
34%
down to 3.5
66%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5
Projected to December: 20% down · 80% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.57. Higher than today’s 3.53 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 4.0
235 of 266
OR · 4.0
438 of 498

Amir is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams20 teams · 2017–2026
IRV-Johnson
2026 Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Men
2026
IRV-Boyer
2026 Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Men
2026
IRV-Boyer
2025 Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Men
2025
IRV-Boyer
2025 Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Men
2025
IRV-Laurent/Steinhoff
2024 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Men
2024
IRV-Laurent/Steinhoff
2024 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Men
2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Amir has played at 3.5, 4.0 across 7 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

3.03.54.02019202020222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020, 2026 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Amir has gone from the 48th to the 92nd percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2024.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.5
58.3%
14W–10L · 55.3% of games
4.0
50%
5W–5L · 47.3% of games
6.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history43 matches
L
2026-06-06 · IRV-Johnson · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Scott Naugler
+0.012about as expected — took 33% of games against 34% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-03-21 · IRV-Boyer · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Pete Jacobs
+0.033better than expected — took 52% of games against 40% expected
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Ken Nichols / Chris Cheng
2026-02-06 · IRV-Boyer · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Pete Jacobs
+0.050better than expected — took 53% of games against 35% expected
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-01-18 · IRV-Boyer · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Rake
+0.025better than expected — took 60% of games against 48% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
Logan Corcoran / Tyler Pell
2025-05-17 · IRV-Boyer · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Willis Boyer
0.001about as expected — took 43% of games against 44% expected
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2025-03-29 · IRV-Boyer · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Pete Jacobs
0.049below expectation — took 39% of games against 60% expected
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2025-03-09 · IRV-Boyer · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mark King
0.017below expectation — took 25% of games against 38% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
2025-02-22 · IRV-Boyer · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Pete Jacobs
0.004about as expected — took 43% of games against 45% expected
7-6, 6-4
W
2025-01-17 · IRV-Boyer · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Pete Jacobs
0.022below expectation — took 57% of games against 64% expected
7-6, 6-4
W
2025-01-11 · IRV-Boyer · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mark King
+0.055better than expected — took 59% of games against 37% expected
6-4, 7-5
W
2024-06-23 · IRV-Laurent/Steinhoff · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Paul Laurent
+0.024better than expected — took 68% of games against 55% expected
7-5, 6-1
L
2024-05-04 · IRV-Laurent/Steinhoff · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrew Kohlmetz
0.024below expectation — took 20% of games against 37% expected
6-1, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.