← Search

Michael Robinson

Bellevue, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
64 matches · 35W–29L · seasons 2019–2026
Where Michael sits
73
2.5
775
3.0
1278
3.5
930
4.0
419
4.5
77
5.0

Michael is one of 775 men at 3.0 in this cohort of 3552. Levels at or below 3.0 account for 24% of them. Shown for men only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Michael has been 3.0 for all 6 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

2.53.0201920202021202220232024

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Michael has gone from the 44th to the 41st percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2023.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.0
61.3%
19W–12L · 53.3% of games
3.5
50%
3W–3L · 47.1% of games
6.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
50%
10W–10L · 54% of games
7.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 44.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history64 matches
L
2025-10-04 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Joseph Holmes
−0.035below expectation — took 14% of games against 38% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
Richard Gould / Wink Thorne
2025-09-14 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Brad Smith
+0.037better than expected — took 71% of games against 51% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
Sudhakar Pitchumani / Rajesh Gatti
2024-04-14 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with David Hasbrook
−0.050below expectation — took 14% of games against 43% expected
6-0, 6-2
W
Daniel Jung / Mike Ho
2024-03-23 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kanik Sem
+0.000about as expected — took 59% of games against 58% expected
6-4, 7-5
W
2024-02-24 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Luke Bienfang
+0.049better than expected — took 71% of games against 46% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2023-11-11 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marilyn Johnson
+0.000below expectation — took 29% of games against 51% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
2023-11-04 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marilyn Johnson
+0.000below expectation — took 20% of games against 52% expected
6-0, 6-3
W
Melissa Manier / David Kimmixed
2023-08-12 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marilyn Johnson
+0.000about as expected — took 59% of games against 63% expected
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
Lisa Mackey / Kevin MacKeymixed
2023-07-30 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tammy Antezana
+0.000below expectation — took 33% of games against 39% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
Cathleen Summers / Blake Summersmixed
2023-07-29 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joanne Brandsma
+0.000better than expected — took 65% of games against 46% expected
7-5, 6-2
W
2023-07-15 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Joanne Brandsma
+0.000about as expected — took 59% of games against 57% expected
6-4, 7-5
L
2023-07-08 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Linda Myhrvold
+0.000about as expected — took 45% of games against 46% expected
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.