← Search

Sarah Lieber-Hale

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Indianapolis, IN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
260 matches · 120W–140L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history260 matches
L
2026-03-28 · Indy 7.5W TUE IRCD Banister · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Bridget Hurry
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-03-17 · Indy 7.5W TUE IRCD Banister · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lorinne Banister
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-03-09 · Indy A18 3.5W MON IRCD Banister · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lorinne Banister
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-4
L
2026-02-23 · Indy A18 3.5W MON IRCD Banister · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lorinne Banister
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-02-16 · Indy A18 3.5W MON IRCD Banister · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leyna Mulholland
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-02-09 · Indy A18 3.5W MON IRCD Banister · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lorinne Banister
loading the estimate
7-5, 3-5, 1-0
W
2026-01-26 · Indy A18 3.5W MON IRCD Banister · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Slowikowski
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-01-12 · Indy A18 3.5W MON IRCD Banister · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lorinne Banister
loading the estimate
6-7, 0-4
W
2026-01-05 · Indy A18 3.5W MON IRCD Banister · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lorinne Banister
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2025-12-08 · CIN A40 3.5W M IRCD Banister · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bridget Hurry
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
L
2025-11-10 · CIN A40 3.5W M IRCD Banister · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lorinne Banister
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2025-11-03 · CIN A40 3.5W M IRCD Banister · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lorinne Banister
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams35 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
50%
3W–3L · 47.2% of games
3.5
49%
75W–78L · 49.5% of games
4.0
28.6%
2W–5L · 41.7% of games
6.5
20%
3W–12L · 42.3% of games
7.0
50%
3W–3L · 49.1% of games
7.5
25%
5W–15L · 40.9% of games
6.5mixed
72.7%
8W–3L · 57.7% of games
7.0mixed
48.7%
19W–20L · 47.8% of games
7.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
107 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
90 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
44 matches
#1 Singles
5%
13 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches
#3 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King