← Search

Dean Bradshaw

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Henderson, NV
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
40 matches · 17W–23L · seasons 2021–2024
Match history40 matches
W
2024-06-09 · WHITNEY MESA PARK · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Carlos Hinojosa
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-3
L
2024-06-02 · WHITNEY MESA PARK · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Harold Craft
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
W
2024-05-19 · WHITNEY MESA PARK · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Carlos Hinojosa
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 7-6
W
2024-05-12 · WHITNEY MESA PARK · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with George Babakitis
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-2
W
2024-05-05 · WHITNEY MESA PARK · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with George Babakitis
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
W
2024-04-28 · WHITNEY MESA PARK · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with George Babakitis
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-3
W
2024-04-21 · WHITNEY MESA PARK · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with George Babakitis
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-2
W
2024-04-14 · WHITNEY MESA PARK · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with George Babakitis
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 6-4
L
2024-04-07 · WHITNEY MESA PARK · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kevin Wogalter
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 2-6
L
2024-03-24 · WHITNEY MESA PARK · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kevin Wogalter
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2023-05-21 · WHITNEY MESA PARK · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jim Roulias
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 5-7
W
2023-05-14 · WHITNEY MESA PARK · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Richard Vandermark
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams5 teams · 2020–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 level played
8.0
42.5%
17W–23L · 46.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 65% of the time
#1 Doubles
65%
26 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
8%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams