Search

Regina Phinney

Olympia, WA
3.5A year-end 2023
35 matches · 17W–18L · seasons 20212024
Where Regina sits
145
2.5
1349
3.0
1627
3.5
1052
4.0
435
4.5
70
5.0

Regina is one of 1627 women at 3.5 in this cohort of 4678. Levels at or below 3.5 account for 67% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Regina has been a steady 3.5 across all 4 seasons on record.

3.03.52021202220232024

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2024 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Regina has gone from the 25th to the 27th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2023.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.0
66.7%
8W–4L · 54.8% of games
3.5
38.9%
7W–11L · 47.6% of games
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history35 matches
W
2024-04-02 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laurie Giebelhaus
+0.042better than expected — took 67% of games against 46% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
Tina Slater / Dana Rock
2024-03-22 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laurie Giebelhaus
+0.025better than expected — took 52% of games against 43% expected
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L
2023-08-10 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kaylee Wagner
+0.004about as expected — took 38% of games against 39% expected
7-5, 6-3
L
2023-08-01 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jill Waters
0.026below expectation — took 29% of games against 44% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
2023-07-20 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jill Waters
0.003about as expected — took 47% of games against 48% expected
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2023-07-07 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kaylee Wagner
+0.022better than expected — took 56% of games against 46% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Maurie-Lynn Lawson / Christiana Petri
2023-06-04 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jill Waters
+0.040better than expected — took 71% of games against 50% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
2023-02-18 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Diane Weston
+0.005about as expected — took 29% of games against 34% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
Lee Ann Strueby / Sachiko Urano
2023-01-07 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Yi Zhao
0.022below expectation — took 33% of games against 46% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
2022-10-08 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Raphael Ravula
+0.000below expectation — took 57% of games against 63% expected
1-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
2022-09-18 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Vichet Hoy
+0.000below expectation — took 47% of games against 58% expected
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2022-04-24 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Connie Smith
0.070below expectation — took 14% of games against 51% expected
6-0, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.