← Search

Wendy Barker

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Champaign, IL
4.0C year-end 2023
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
54 matches · 28W–26L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history54 matches
L
2026-03-07 · 7.5W Winter Combo Ottemann/Tracy-Champaign · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Dorothy Deschler
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-03-07 · 7.5W Winter Combo Ottemann/Tracy-Champaign · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Cynthia Ottemann
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 2-6
L
2025-12-06 · MSIL 7.5W Fall Combo Ottemann/Tracy-Champaign · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tatyana Deryugina
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 0-6
W
2025-11-01 · MSIL 7.5W Fall Combo Ottemann/Tracy-Champaign · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tatyana Deryugina
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W
2025-11-01 · MSIL 7.5W Fall Combo Ottemann/Tracy-Champaign · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tatyana Deryugina
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
W
2023-05-07 · MSIL 4.0W Tri-Level Brown-Champaign · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Felina Kelly
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2023-05-07 · MSIL 4.0W Tri-Level Brown-Champaign · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Felina Kelly
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-6
L
2023-03-05 · MSIL 4.0W Tri-Level Brown-Champaign · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Felina Kelly
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
L
2022-06-22 · MSIL A40&O 4.0W Hoag-Champaign · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tara Earls Larrison
loading the estimate
5-7, 3-6
L
2022-06-18 · MSIL A40&O 4.0W Hoag-Champaign · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tara Earls Larrison
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2022-05-11 · MSIL A40&O 4.0W Hoag-Champaign · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sharon Jackson
loading the estimate
0-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2021-10-24 · MSIL 4.5W Tri-Level Hoag-Champaign · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Molly McMahon
loading the estimate
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
75%
9W–3L · 64.9% of games
4.0
21.1%
4W–15L · 41.1% of games
6.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
57.1%
8W–6L · 53.2% of games
7.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 53% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
19 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
12 matches
#1 Singles
17%
9 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe