← Search

Natalie Brown

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Washington, IL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
81 matches · 23W–58L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history81 matches
L
2026-05-17 · MSIL 4.5W Tri-Level Howe-Bloomington · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Paige McNamara
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-26 · MSIL 4.5W Tri-Level Howe-Bloomington · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Destiny Galvan
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-15 · MSIL 4.5W Tri-Level Howe-Bloomington · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lisa Wegner
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-15 · MSIL 4.5W Tri-Level Howe-Bloomington · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lisa Wegner
loading the estimate
4-6, 0-6
W
2026-02-08 · MSIL 7.5 Winter Combo Mixed Spitalny-Peoria · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Chad Brooks mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-6
L
2026-02-08 · MSIL 7.5 Winter Combo Mixed Spitalny-Peoria · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Mark Miller mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-12-07 · MSIL 7.5 Fall Combo Mixed Risinger-Springfield · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Joshua Risinger mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
L
2025-12-07 · MSIL 7.5 Fall Combo Mixed Risinger-Springfield · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Joshua Risinger mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
W
2025-11-22 · MSIL 7.5 Fall Combo Mixed Risinger-Springfield · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Connor Mcandrew mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-2
W
2025-11-09 · MSIL 7.5 Fall Combo Mixed Risinger-Springfield · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with William Ehrlich mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
L
2025-09-07 · MSIL 3.0/3.5/4.0 Tri-Level McNamara-Bloomington · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Paige McNamara
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
L
2025-09-07 · MSIL 3.0/3.5/4.0 Tri-Level McNamara-Bloomington · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Paige McNamara
loading the estimate
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.0
32.5%
13W–27L · 44.1% of games
4.5
20%
1W–4L · 37.4% of games
6.5
75%
3W–1L · 56.8% of games
7.5
0%
0W–7L · 31.5% of games
8.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
37.5%
3W–5L · 44% of games
8.0mixed
21.4%
3W–11L · 44.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
36 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
23 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
12 matches
#1 Singles
11%
9 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe