← Search

Nick DiMartino

Seattle, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
112 matches · 70W–42L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.07
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 5 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
20%
stay 3.0
80%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 66% stay · 34% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.97. Lower than today’s 3.07 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.0
39 of 144
WA · 3.0
148 of 755

Nick is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Nick has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 8 seasons — 1 move up and 1 down.

2.53.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Nick has gone from the 93rd to the 73rd percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2023.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
3.0
64.4%
29W–16L · 57.4% of games
3.5
50%
5W–5L · 45.9% of games
6.0
87.5%
14W–2L · 60.1% of games
7.0
63.6%
7W–4L · 56% of games
6.0mixed
61.5%
8W–5L · 53.4% of games
7.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 42.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history112 matches
L
Craighton Goeppele / Thane Liffick
2026-06-07 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nicky Dimartino
−0.005about as expected — took 44% of games against 46% expected
7-6, 7-5
L
Ian Brown / Ian Davis
2026-04-24 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nicky Dimartino
−0.022below expectation — took 33% of games against 45% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Chris Chau / Ben Chia
2026-01-04 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brian Kelly
+0.004below expectation — took 25% of games against 31% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
N/A
2025-10-26 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joel Delman
+0.021better than expected — took 100% of games against 75% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
2025-09-26 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Douglas Pearson
−0.007about as expected — took 38% of games against 43% expected
7-5, 6-3
L
John MacDonald / Lloyd Sandquist
2025-04-18 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Glynn Omoto
+0.021better than expected — took 47% of games against 39% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
Elliott Straube / Xi Chen
2025-04-06 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gabe Licka
+0.022better than expected — took 59% of games against 49% expected
6-3, 7-6
W
2025-02-07 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Darrin Hansen
−0.005about as expected — took 44% of games against 49% expected
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2025-02-01 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Darrin Hansen
−0.041below expectation — took 8% of games against 36% expected
6-1, 6-0
W
N/A
2025-01-24 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brian Kelly
+0.039better than expected — took 100% of games against 69% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
Michael Ensing / Steve Carl
2024-09-28 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robert Sidbury
−0.011about as expected — took 60% of games against 62% expected
6-1, 5-7, 1-0
W
N/A
2024-09-13 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Matthew Metz
+0.061better than expected — took 100% of games against 62% expected
6-0, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.