← Search

Rickard Hood

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Rogers, AR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
256 matches · 123W–133L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history256 matches
W
2026-08-22 · Pautsch/Sullivan/Bella Vista · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leigh Wendlandt mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-08-21 · Pautsch/Sullivan/Bella Vista · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leigh Wendlandt mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-08-16 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anne Hurley mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-08-15 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anne Hurley mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W
Default
2026-08-02 · Warner/Rogers/SVCC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Kehoe mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-07-28 · Warner/Rogers/SVCC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sandra Hood mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-19 · Raymond/Rogers/SVCC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tiffiny Humbert mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-07-19 · Mejia/Rogers/SVCC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sandra Hood mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-17 · Warner/Rogers/SVCC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sandra Hood mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 1-6
L
2026-07-14 · Mejia/Rogers/SVCC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sandra Hood mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-14 · Warner/Rogers/SVCC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristine Warner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-07-12 · Hurley/BellaVista/KTC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anne Hurley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams56 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.5
51.9%
41W–38L · 52% of games
4.0
34.4%
22W–42L · 44.9% of games
6.5
61.9%
13W–8L · 55.1% of games
7.5
65.2%
15W–8L · 58.1% of games
3.5mixed
57.1%
12W–9L · 52.2% of games
4.0mixed
20%
3W–12L · 37.6% of games
6.0mixed
50%
8W–8L · 50.3% of games
7.0mixed
53.3%
8W–7L · 51.3% of games
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
97 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
90 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
64 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
3 matches
#1 Male Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams