← Search

Robert Heller

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Boise, ID
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
53 matches · 24W–29L · seasons 2019–2025
Match history53 matches
L
2025-07-09 · String Tension · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Steven Buchanan
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 1-6
L
2025-06-18 · String Tension · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Steven Buchanan
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 2-6
L
2025-06-09 · String Tension · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Garrett
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2025-06-04 · String Tension · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Garrett
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 1-6
W
2023-06-28 · Met Your Net · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Richard Scharf
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-1
L
2023-06-26 · Met Your Net · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Richard Scharf
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2023-06-14 · Met Your Net · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Roger Hawkins
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2023-06-12 · Met Your Net · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dana Platt
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2023-05-24 · Met Your Net · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Randy Carroll
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
L
2023-05-01 · Add In · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patrick Moore
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2023-04-26 · Add In · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bradley Enscoe
loading the estimate
1-6, 5-7
L
2023-04-17 · Add In · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Craig Routson
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2019–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
41.4%
12W–17L · 48.5% of games
7.0
26.7%
4W–11L · 43.1% of games
6.5mixed
100%
4W–0L · 67.1% of games
7.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 57.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
34%
18 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
16 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams