← Search

Cathy Ramirez

Olympia, WA
3.0C year-end 2024
91 matches · 45W–46L · seasons 2019–2024
Where Cathy sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Cathy is one of 1173 women at 3.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 3.0 account for 30% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Cathy has been 3.0 for all 6 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

2.53.0201920202021202220232024

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Cathy has gone from the 25th to the 72nd percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2024.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.0
58.1%
25W–18L · 52.4% of games
6.0
59.1%
13W–9L · 53.6% of games
7.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
50%
4W–4L · 52.9% of games
7.0mixed
0%
0W–5L · 28% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history91 matches
L
2024-04-27 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with George Ramirez
+0.000about as expected — took 45% of games against 47% expected
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
Christine Hills / Victoria Masselink
2024-04-20 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mi Ae Kim
+0.070better than expected — took 92% of games against 54% expected
6-1, 6-0
W
Lucy Zhou / Thida Vongvilay
2024-04-06 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Denise Gentzler
+0.039better than expected — took 75% of games against 54% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
2024-03-17 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Julie Nierenberg
−0.001about as expected — took 52% of games against 51% expected
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2024-03-10 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with RJ Widrow
+0.000better than expected — took 56% of games against 42% expected
7-5, 7-6
W
Liz VanDerschelden / Michael Osthusmixed
2024-03-02 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with George Ramirez
+0.000better than expected — took 60% of games against 46% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
2024-02-24 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jill Tokarczyk
−0.001about as expected — took 53% of games against 51% expected
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2024-01-28 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stephanie Prentice
−0.002about as expected — took 33% of games against 38% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
2024-01-21 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Denise Gentzler
+0.002about as expected — took 48% of games against 46% expected
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W
Maureen Calkins / Trudi Pomeroy
2024-01-13 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jill Tokarczyk
+0.027better than expected — took 75% of games against 58% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
2023-10-28 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Julie Peters
−0.028below expectation — took 14% of games against 36% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
Stacy Cromer / Jill Hamilchamps
2023-10-21 · #2 Doubles · with Jill Tokarczyk
−0.012below expectation — took 29% of games against 39% expected
6-1, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.