Search

Maureen Calkins

Centralia, WA
2.5C year-end 2024
50 matches · 11W–39L · seasons 20192025
Where Maureen sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Maureen is one of 123 women at 2.5 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 2.5 account for 3% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Maureen has played at 3.0, 2.5 across 6 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

2.02.53.0201920202021202220232024

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2021 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Maureen has gone from the 15th to the 3rd percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2024.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
3.0
21.9%
7W–25L · 35% of games
6.0
22.2%
4W–14L · 42% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history50 matches
L
Cindy Atkison / Shelley Stern
2024-11-23 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Liana Angove-Sowa
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-0, 6-1
L
Deborah Sargeant / Bonnie Shorin
2024-11-16 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Liana Angove-Sowa
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L
Tammie Dailey / Charmaine Leicht
2024-10-06 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Trudi Pomeroy
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2024-03-17 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Liana Angove-Sowa
+0.029about as expected — took 29% of games against 26% expected
6-4, 6-1
W
2024-03-10 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kathy Frazier
0.005about as expected — took 50% of games against 53% expected
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Kristina Maritczak / Adriana Zamora
2024-02-25 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kathy Frazier
0.022below expectation — took 29% of games against 43% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
2024-02-03 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jan Bradshaw
0.034below expectation — took 29% of games against 48% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2024-01-13 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Trudi Pomeroy
0.027below expectation — took 25% of games against 42% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
2023-03-18 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jill Nielson
0.035below expectation — took 20% of games against 41% expected
6-0, 6-3
L
2023-02-26 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Liana Angove-Sowa
0.005below expectation — took 29% of games against 37% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
Denise Costanti / Muriel Wohrle
2023-02-25 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jill Nielson
0.021below expectation — took 25% of games against 40% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
Charmaine Leicht / Peggy Blankenship
2023-01-29 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Laura Hawthorne
0.001about as expected — took 33% of games against 38% expected
6-3, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.