Search

Kate Perry

Lakewood, WA
3.0C year-end 2024
65 matches · 19W–46L · seasons 20192024
Where Kate sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Kate is one of 1173 women at 3.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 3.0 account for 30% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Kate has been 3.0 for all 5 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

2.53.020192020202220232024

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 6.0, Kate has gone from the 20th to the 5th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2024.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.0
42.3%
11W–15L · 48.4% of games
6.0
23.3%
7W–23L · 38.7% of games
7.0
0%
0W–5L · 33.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history65 matches
L
Anne Marie Stedham / Nachiko Yamamoto
2024-06-15 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Teena Ward
0.030below expectation — took 29% of games against 46% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
2024-06-01 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Lusty
0.014below expectation — took 14% of games against 31% expected
6-0, 6-2
W
Kathy Baumgardner / Martha Brenna
2024-05-25 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Lusty
0.044below expectation — took 52% of games against 68% expected
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Adriana Zamora / Karen Oie
2024-05-05 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nicole Enslow
+0.059better than expected — took 80% of games against 49% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
Barbara Floro / Kathrine Wright
2023-11-18 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jun Zhu
0.001about as expected — took 43% of games against 44% expected
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2023-11-11 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jun Zhu
+0.002about as expected — took 44% of games against 44% expected
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
2023-11-04 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cynthia Thompson
0.040below expectation — took 14% of games against 39% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
2023-10-29 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Connie Worthen
+0.023about as expected — took 29% of games against 28% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
2023-09-24 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Debby Sigel
+0.015about as expected — took 29% of games against 31% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
2023-03-18 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Connie Worthen
+0.035better than expected — took 80% of games against 59% expected
6-0, 6-3
L
2023-03-04 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Beth Nichols
+0.005below expectation — took 20% of games against 29% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
2023-02-04 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Connie Worthen
+0.013about as expected — took 40% of games against 37% expected
6-4, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.