← Search

Sladana Radonic

Las Vegas, NV
0.0 year-end
100 matches · 54W–46L · seasons 2019–2022
Where Sladana sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Sladana is one of 0 women at 0.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Sladana has been a steady 3.5 across all 4 seasons on record.

3.03.52019202020212022

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Sladana has gone from the 68th to the 80th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2022.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
3.5
55.6%
50W–40L · 53.1% of games
4.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history100 matches
W
2022-06-17 · #3 Doubles · with Rosemary Turner
+0.001about as expected — took 45% of games against 47% expected
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
Karen Kiyono / Janet Nelson
2022-06-04 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly Maier
+0.036better than expected — took 58% of games against 43% expected
7-5, 7-5
W
2022-05-21 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly Maier
+0.016better than expected — took 60% of games against 52% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
Florinda Cudiamat / Lucy Li
2022-05-14 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Levasseur
+0.030better than expected — took 55% of games against 41% expected
1-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2022-04-30 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hilary Vincent-Philpot
+0.004about as expected — took 45% of games against 44% expected
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
Kelley Oakley / Lynn Higgins
2022-04-23 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leticia Schoff
−0.002about as expected — took 55% of games against 56% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
N/A
2022-04-09 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cynthia Zanzig
−0.006better than expected — took 100% of games against 85% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
2021-11-06 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rosemary Turner
−0.023below expectation — took 37% of games against 49% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
Courtney Loughridge / Mandy Hansen
2021-11-03 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amrita Soli
−0.040below expectation — took 29% of games against 50% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2021-10-27 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hilary Vincent-Philpot
−0.067below expectation — took 37% of games against 64% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
Stephanie Cook / Jennifer Unick
2021-10-23 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laurie Lenhart
−0.008below expectation — took 14% of games against 29% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
Andra Starr Scano / Allison Festa
2021-10-20 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mari Valvo
+0.002about as expected — took 63% of games against 60% expected
6-4, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.