Search

Mark Williams

BURIEN, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
63 matches · 30W–33L · seasons 20192025
Where Mark sits
73
2.5
775
3.0
1278
3.5
930
4.0
419
4.5
77
5.0

Mark is one of 775 men at 3.0 in this cohort of 3552. Levels at or below 3.0 account for 24% of them. Shown for men only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Mark has been 3.0 for all 6 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

2.53.0201920212022202320242025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Mark has gone from the 57th to the 56th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2024.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
50%
20W–20L · 52% of games
3.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
45%
9W–11L · 52.6% of games
7.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history63 matches
W
Haowen Chen / Frankie Fong
2025-04-12 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anand Thiyagarajan
+0.051better than expected — took 75% of games against 48% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Richard Kocher / Daniel Fang
2025-04-04 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jef St de Lore
+0.010better than expected — took 62% of games against 56% expected
6-2, 7-6
W
Peter Cruz / Medilyn Barrettmixed
2024-11-10 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Olivia Salinas
+0.000better than expected — took 80% of games against 37% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
2024-11-02 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sarah Gardner
+0.000better than expected — took 86% of games against 70% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
Khyati Pradeep Suratwala / Rishabh Ahluwaliamixed
2024-10-25 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sarah Gardner
+0.000better than expected — took 62% of games against 42% expected
7-5, 6-3
L
2024-09-22 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Leah Carroll
+0.000below expectation — took 47% of games against 57% expected
6-1, 1-6, 1-0
W
2024-07-13 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kana Waldron
+0.000better than expected — took 92% of games against 65% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
Ann Swiftney / Vinnie Flyntmixed
2024-06-30 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jennifer Booth
+0.000about as expected — took 48% of games against 52% expected
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Michelle Dauphiny Becker / Chris Beckermixed
2024-06-16 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with JOANNE SHUTT
+0.000better than expected — took 92% of games against 71% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
Deepak Agrawal / Jag Singh
2024-05-18 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chen Hsu
0.006below expectation — took 25% of games against 35% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
Jiaxing Zheng / Kun Qian
2024-05-17 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Chen Hsu
0.053below expectation — took 29% of games against 55% expected
6-4, 6-1
W
Peter Cruz / Xin Huang
2024-05-11 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Phat Dinh
+0.047better than expected — took 92% of games against 62% expected
6-1, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.