← Search

James Freeman

Edmonds, WA
0.0 year-end
101 matches · 49W–52L · seasons 2019–2021
Where James sits
65
2.5
683
3.0
1159
3.5
856
4.0
395
4.5
67
5.0

James is one of 0 men at 0.0 in this cohort of 3225. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for men only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

James has been a steady 3.0 across all 3 seasons on record.

2.53.0201920202021

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, James has gone from the 60th to the 11th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2021.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
3.0
48.8%
20W–21L · 51.9% of games
3.5
45.5%
5W–6L · 49.2% of games
6.0
85.7%
6W–1L · 58.8% of games
7.0
64.3%
9W–5L · 50.6% of games
6.0mixed
53.8%
7W–6L · 56% of games
7.0mixed
14.3%
2W–12L · 39.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history101 matches
L
2021-07-05 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Steve Stetter
−0.040below expectation — took 44% of games against 60% expected
7-5, 2-2
W
2021-07-04 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Steve Stetter
+0.012better than expected — took 71% of games against 61% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
N/A
2021-07-03 · #2 Singles · 3.0
+0.108better than expected — took 100% of games against 44% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
2021-06-26 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Richard Gaevert
−0.009about as expected — took 41% of games against 46% expected
7-5, 6-4
W
2021-06-13 · #1 Singles · 3.5
+0.091better than expected — took 80% of games against 38% expected
6-3, 6-0
L
2021-06-12 · #1 Singles · 3.0
−0.040below expectation — took 59% of games against 67% expected
6-4, 0-6, 1-0
L
2021-06-12 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nicolai Petersen
−0.066below expectation — took 8% of games against 45% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
Shashank Kavishwar
2021-06-04 · #1 Singles · 3.5
+0.008about as expected — took 29% of games against 33% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
Jacob Lin
2021-05-24 · #1 Singles · 3.5
+0.169better than expected — took 52% of games against 29% expected
6-7, 5-3
L
Scott Haynie
2021-05-22 · #2 Singles · 3.0
−0.063below expectation — took 20% of games against 53% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
2021-05-15 · #2 Singles · 3.0
−0.001about as expected — took 61% of games against 59% expected
7-6, 4-1
L
Salim Peshawaria / Matthew Day
2021-05-09 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mark Eshom
−0.026below expectation — took 29% of games against 44% expected
6-3, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.