Search

Sarah Familian

Henderson, NV
3.0C year-end 2025
106 matches · 50W–56L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.81
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 4 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
99%
stay 3.0
1%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Henderson · 3.0
18 of 22
NV · 3.0
128 of 166

Sarah is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Sarah has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 8 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.53.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2026 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Sarah has gone from the 89th to the 8th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
2.5
61.9%
13W–8L · 56.1% of games
3.0
44%
33W–42L · 48.1% of games
3.5
40%
4W–6L · 50% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history106 matches
L
Margo Isler / Melissa Mullin
2026-05-13 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andra Starr Scano
+0.018better than expected — took 56% of games against 46% expected
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-22 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marchelle Locke
0.016below expectation — took 29% of games against 41% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
Laura Larsen / Mandy Hansen
2026-04-08 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Crystal LaTour
0.016below expectation — took 0% of games against 23% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-02-25 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marchelle Locke
+0.036better than expected — took 52% of games against 39% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
Kayla Cervantes / Valerie Valow-Orris
2025-12-02 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carrie Maddux
+0.002below expectation — took 29% of games against 35% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
Jenny Mulopulos / Nina Rossi
2025-11-18 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carrie Maddux
+0.011about as expected — took 41% of games against 38% expected
7-5, 6-4
L
Cindi Ray / Jennifer Miller
2025-11-12 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carrie Maddux
0.006below expectation — took 32% of games against 38% expected
6-1, 7-5
W
Katie Kerestesi / Christa Wirges
2025-11-11 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carrie Maddux
+0.008about as expected — took 47% of games against 46% expected
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
Ally Downer / Kayla Cervantes
2025-10-08 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Rosenthal
+0.032better than expected — took 37% of games against 30% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
Jessica Borghoff / Abigail Cox
2025-10-07 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carrie Maddux
0.012below expectation — took 20% of games against 34% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2025-10-01 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Crystal LaTour
0.000about as expected — took 55% of games against 52% expected
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
Addy Iveth Zilberman / Helen McDaniel
2025-09-30 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carrie Maddux
+0.069better than expected — took 86% of games against 49% expected
6-2, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.