Search

Dani McIntyre

Seattle, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
110 matches · 76W–34L · seasons 20192025
Where Dani sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Dani is one of 1013 women at 4.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 4.0 account for 89% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Dani has played at 3.5, 4.0 across 7 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

3.03.54.02019202020212022202320242025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2019 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Dani has gone from the 85th to the 97th percentile of players at that level, 2020 to 2024.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.5
84.1%
53W–10L · 63% of games
4.0
33.3%
4W–8L · 50% of games
6.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
63.6%
7W–4L · 51.2% of games
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history110 matches
L
Michele Dearing / Erica Mitchellchamps
2025-08-22 · #2 Doubles · with Jennie Hong
0.026below expectation — took 39% of games against 52% expected
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2025-07-29 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mila Niset
+0.059better than expected — took 80% of games against 49% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
Mina Park / Cindy Park
2025-07-22 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christie Shan
0.031below expectation — took 37% of games against 52% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
2025-07-11 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jillian Turner
0.017below expectation — took 41% of games against 49% expected
6-4, 7-5
L
2025-07-06 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Debra White
0.027below expectation — took 48% of games against 58% expected
7-6, 6-7, 1-0
W
2025-07-06 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Alexander Ung
+0.000below expectation — took 50% of games against 61% expected
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
Amy Sung / Le Zhangmixed
2025-06-22 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Alexander Ung
+0.000about as expected — took 75% of games against 70% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
2025-05-30 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emily Hawkins
0.006below expectation — took 35% of games against 41% expected
7-5, 6-2
L
Ellen Acuario / Tessa Tapmongkol
2025-05-11 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emily Hawkins
0.003about as expected — took 41% of games against 44% expected
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-05-04 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rachel Smith
+0.026better than expected — took 41% of games against 34% expected
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
Jenalyn Bush / Angie Harwood
2025-03-29 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alexia Newgord
+0.031better than expected — took 80% of games against 60% expected
6-3, 6-0
W
2025-03-29 · #3 Doubles · with Jennie Hong
+0.025better than expected — took 50% of games against 41% expected
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.