Search

Sarah Tays

Bonney Lake, WA
2.5C year-end 2025
138 matches · 41W–97L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.02.53.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.66
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 10 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.0
2%
stay 2.5
98%
up to 3.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 32% stay · 68% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.54. Lower than today’s 2.66 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 2.5 runs from 2.01 to 2.50. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
WA · 2.5
8 of 35

Sarah is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Sarah has played at 3.0, 2.5 across 8 seasons — 1 move up and 1 down.

2.02.53.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Sarah has gone from the 12th to the 5th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2023.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
2.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0
26.4%
23W–64L · 40.1% of games
3.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0
25%
2W–6L · 42% of games
6.0mixed
45.5%
15W–18L · 49.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history138 matches
W
N/Amixed
2026-05-02 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Zheng Ge
+0.000better than expected — took 100% of games against 63% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
Kris Adams / Timothy Adamsmixed
2026-04-26 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ken Enslow
+0.000better than expected — took 75% of games against 55% expected
6-4, 6-0
W
Michael Heelan / Angela Ganomixed
2026-03-15 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Zheng Ge
+0.000better than expected — took 67% of games against 50% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-03-08 · #1 Singles · 3.0
+0.014about as expected — took 35% of games against 34% expected
6-1, 7-6
L
2026-03-01 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Scott Baird
+0.000below expectation — took 25% of games against 43% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-02-01 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Kenmir
+0.003below expectation — took 14% of games against 26% expected
6-2, 6-0
L
Rebecca Hinman
2025-12-20 · #1 Singles · 3.0
0.020below expectation — took 14% of games against 33% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
Dominique Mansilla Hermann
2025-11-08 · #1 Singles · 3.0
+0.021better than expected — took 56% of games against 47% expected
4-6, 6-2
L
2025-10-25 · #1 Singles · 3.0
+0.082better than expected — took 57% of games against 25% expected
1-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
Morgan Steele
2025-10-11 · #1 Singles · 3.0
+0.009about as expected — took 38% of games against 37% expected
3-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
2025-09-06 · #1 Singles · 3.0
+0.007below expectation — took 14% of games against 24% expected
6-0, 6-2
L
2025-08-23 · #1 Singles · 3.0
0.037below expectation — took 20% of games against 42% expected
6-2, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.