← Search

Paul Hickman

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Fayetteville, AR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
224 matches · 95W–129L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history224 matches
L
2026-07-16 · Hickman/Fayetteville/SRC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carol Bartz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-06-02 · Hickman/Fayetteville/SRC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rebecca Williams mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-02 · Scarbrough/Betonville/SRC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with STEFANO ROSSO
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-21 · Scarbrough/Fayetteville/SRC · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Spencer Scarbrough
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-5
L
2026-04-11 · Johnson-Hickman/Springdale/SRC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Harris
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-11 · Scarbrough/Betonville/SRC · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robert Meek
loading the estimate
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-29 · Johnson-Hickman/Springdale/SRC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Spencer Scarbrough
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-29 · Scarbrough/Fayetteville/SRC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mitchell Johnson
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-08 · Scarbrough/Betonville/SRC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robert Meek
loading the estimate
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-02-20 · Johnson-Hickman/Springdale/SRC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ronald Chioldi
loading the estimate
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-02-14 · Johnson-Hickman/Springdale/SRC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mitchell Johnson
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-7
W
2025-07-29 · Johnson-Hickman/Springdale/SRC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rebecca Williams mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams50 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.0
80%
8W–2L · 64% of games
3.25
57.1%
4W–3L · 56.6% of games
3.5
49.4%
43W–44L · 50% of games
4.0
23.1%
6W–20L · 39.4% of games
6.5
29.4%
5W–12L · 41.3% of games
7.5
60%
3W–2L · 51.7% of games
3.5mixed
40%
8W–12L · 45% of games
6.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
38.5%
15W–24L · 44.7% of games
8.0mixed
10%
1W–9L · 36.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
82 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
70 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
64 matches
#3 Singles
1%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
3 matches
#1 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal