Search

Nia Nguyen

Renton, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
66 matches · 48W–18L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.18
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 6 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
1%
stay 3.0
99%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 24% stay · 76% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.06. Lower than today’s 3.18 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Renton · 3.0
1 of 14
WA · 3.0
40 of 960

Nia is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Nia has played at 2.5, 3.0 across 7 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.02.53.02019202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Nia has gone from the 21st to the 76th percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
2.5
100%
8W–0L · 76.4% of games
3.0
71.1%
27W–11L · 57.8% of games
6.0mixed
76.5%
13W–4L · 61.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history66 matches
W
Vera Makianich / April Boyce
2026-02-22 · #1 Female Doubles · 3.0 · with Flavia Storelli
+0.077better than expected — took 100% of games against 57% expected
6-0
L
Joycelyn Su / Shweta Omkaram
2026-02-06 · #1 Female Doubles · 3.0 · with Valeriia Zaychenko
0.030below expectation — took 40% of games against 54% expected
6-4
W
Hannah Kim / Justine Lin
2026-01-16 · #1 Female Doubles · 3.0 · with Olivia Salinas
+0.072better than expected — took 86% of games against 48% expected
6-1
L
Wen Cui / Michael Qimixed
2025-11-16 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Chris Tom
+0.000below expectation — took 33% of games against 42% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
Jared Oren / AliceJane Brushmixed
2025-10-12 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Arthur Nakata
+0.000better than expected — took 61% of games against 55% expected
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
Chris Pratley / Seiko Kobayashimixed
2025-09-07 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Gabriel Perez - *
+0.000better than expected — took 75% of games against 67% expected
6-0, 6-4
L
Julia Bai / Wenjing Yin
2025-08-08 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with My-Hong Truong
0.009below expectation — took 38% of games against 44% expected
7-5, 6-3
W
Jessica Crump / Michelle Peterson
2025-08-06 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Doris Cruz
+0.047better than expected — took 80% of games against 54% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
N/A
2025-07-26 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with My-Hong Truong
+0.071better than expected — took 100% of games against 59% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
Amy Friedland / TESSA GORMAN
2025-07-23 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Doris Cruz
+0.020better than expected — took 67% of games against 55% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
Murphy Mack / Morgan Cunningham
2025-07-15 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with My-Hong Truong
+0.021better than expected — took 71% of games against 58% expected
5-2
W
Lavina Poorswani
2025-06-27 · #1 Singles · 3.0
0.005about as expected — took 71% of games against 66% expected
6-1, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.