Search

Jessica Crump

Mercer Island, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
72 matches · 31W–41L · seasons 20192025
Where Jessica sits
145
2.5
1349
3.0
1627
3.5
1052
4.0
435
4.5
70
5.0

Jessica is one of 1349 women at 3.0 in this cohort of 4678. Levels at or below 3.0 account for 32% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Jessica has been 3.0 for all 6 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

2.53.0201920202022202320242025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Jessica has gone from the 9th to the 52nd percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.0
40%
20W–30L · 48.3% of games
6.0mixed
75%
9W–3L · 57.6% of games
7.0mixed
0%
0W–6L · 35.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history72 matches
L
Allie Wood / Leah Allen
2025-08-09 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle Peterson
+0.014better than expected — took 47% of games against 41% expected
7-6, 2-2
L
2025-08-06 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle Peterson
0.047below expectation — took 20% of games against 46% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
Sallie Ragsdale / Amy Friedland
2025-07-31 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle Peterson
0.006about as expected — took 50% of games against 52% expected
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
Casey Castello / Morgan Cunningham
2025-07-20 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cara Perla
+0.003better than expected — took 67% of games against 61% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
2025-06-24 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Leclercq
0.009about as expected — took 52% of games against 54% expected
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-05-17 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Garima Tandon
+0.008better than expected — took 62% of games against 57% expected
7-6, 6-2
W
Flora Wilson / Alison Shea
2025-04-27 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brandy Nordstrom
0.022below expectation — took 50% of games against 60% expected
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2025-04-26 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Veena Shankaran
0.025below expectation — took 40% of games against 52% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
Tiffany Chau / Janine Sy
2025-04-12 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sharon Singh
0.007about as expected — took 38% of games against 43% expected
7-6, 6-2
W
Dawn Spratley / Rebecca Hoogs
2025-04-05 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sharon Singh
+0.002about as expected — took 67% of games against 62% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
Pauline Lane / Rachel Malenchamps
2025-03-23 · #3 Doubles · with Michelle Peterson
+0.006about as expected — took 43% of games against 42% expected
7-6, 6-4
W
2025-03-01 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle Peterson
+0.019better than expected — took 75% of games against 61% expected
6-2, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.