Search

Sarah Leclercq

Mercer Island, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
58 matches · 28W–30L · seasons 20192025
Where Sarah sits
145
2.5
1349
3.0
1627
3.5
1052
4.0
435
4.5
70
5.0

Sarah is one of 1349 women at 3.0 in this cohort of 4678. Levels at or below 3.0 account for 32% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Sarah has been a steady 3.0 across all 7 seasons on record.

2.53.02019202020212022202320242025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2023, 2024, 2025 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Sarah has gone from the 43rd to the 38th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2022.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
3.0
46.8%
22W–25L · 49.6% of games
6.0mixed
54.5%
6W–5L · 52% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history58 matches
W
2025-07-31 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cara Perla
+0.042better than expected — took 75% of games against 52% expected
6-0, 6-4
L
Julia Bai / Skylar Sherwood
2025-06-28 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cara Perla
0.012below expectation — took 37% of games against 44% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
2025-06-24 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jessica Crump
0.009about as expected — took 52% of games against 54% expected
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L
2024-08-01 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jessica Crump
0.030below expectation — took 20% of games against 39% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
2024-07-28 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cara Perla
+0.024better than expected — took 61% of games against 50% expected
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2024-07-18 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cara Perla
+0.024better than expected — took 62% of games against 50% expected
6-3, 7-5
W
Edith Laird / Annabella Chiocco
2024-07-14 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cara Perla
+0.021better than expected — took 68% of games against 56% expected
6-1, 7-5
L
2023-07-30 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jessica Crump
0.017below expectation — took 29% of games against 41% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
2023-07-26 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Leigh Staddon-Smith
+0.059better than expected — took 71% of games against 42% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
Melissa Malley / Kimberly Miller
2023-07-19 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jessica Crump
+0.029better than expected — took 53% of games against 39% expected
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2023-07-07 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cara Perla
0.040below expectation — took 25% of games against 47% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
2022-08-14 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Richard Marcou
+0.000better than expected — took 60% of games against 47% expected
6-4, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.