← Search

Janet Cathcart

Lake Oswego, OR
0.0 year-end
42 matches · 32W–10L · seasons 2019–2022
Where Janet sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Janet is one of 0 women at 0.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Janet has been a steady 3.5 across all 3 seasons on record.

3.03.5201920202021

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Janet has gone from the 47th to the 84th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2020.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.5
69.2%
9W–4L · 55.6% of games
7.0
100%
7W–0L · 66.9% of games
7.0mixed
73.7%
14W–5L · 60.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history42 matches
W
Emily Qi / Maritess Mayer
2021-10-09 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jane Pinkowski
+0.030better than expected — took 59% of games against 45% expected
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
Sheryl Wecker / Catherine Greenblatt
2021-10-03 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jane Pinkowski
+0.028better than expected — took 68% of games against 53% expected
6-1, 7-5
W
2021-06-05 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeff Anhaltzer
+0.000better than expected — took 63% of games against 58% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
2021-05-22 · #3 Doubles · with Hong Huynh
−0.001about as expected — took 57% of games against 56% expected
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2021-05-21 · #3 Doubles · with Hong Huynh
+0.017better than expected — took 71% of games against 59% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
2021-04-25 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with William Hertford
+0.000about as expected — took 53% of games against 56% expected
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2021-04-16 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristin Bialobok
−0.031below expectation — took 50% of games against 61% expected
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W
2021-04-10 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with George Husbands
+0.000about as expected — took 68% of games against 70% expected
7-6, 6-0
W
2021-04-02 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Suttich
−0.026about as expected — took 67% of games against 70% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
Kerri Pinelli / William Pinellimixed
2020-03-01 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Richard Anderson
+0.000better than expected — took 75% of games against 50% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
2020-02-28 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with William Hertford
+0.000better than expected — took 75% of games against 63% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
Jennifer Woodard / Geneann Shepherd
2020-02-15 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with L Caples Mittelstadt
+0.042better than expected — took 86% of games against 60% expected
6-0, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.