Search

Ilona Vondolovski

Portland, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
96 matches · 39W–57L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.67
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 14 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
2%
down to 2.5
98%
stay 3.0
0%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 3.0
318 of 357
OR · 3.0
529 of 600

Ilona is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Ilona has been a steady 3.0 across all 8 seasons on record.

2.53.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Ilona has gone from the 37th to the 27th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.0
45.6%
31W–37L · 50.2% of games
6.0
71.4%
5W–2L · 59.8% of games
6.0mixed
15.8%
3W–16L · 40.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history96 matches
L
Chelsea Smith / Lindsey Yeung
2026-05-31 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dar Dragoon
0.021below expectation — took 28% of games against 41% expected
7-5, 6-0
W
2026-05-24 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Andrew Adeboi
+0.000below expectation — took 47% of games against 61% expected
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
Rupali Avasare / Elizabeth Yutan
2026-05-03 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Deb Landau
0.005about as expected — took 50% of games against 53% expected
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
Gail Johnson / Theresa Hagerty
2026-04-26 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Luz Zanavich
+0.005about as expected — took 53% of games against 49% expected
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-19 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with James Carey
+0.000about as expected — took 37% of games against 38% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-03-27 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cordelia Tilghman
+0.014better than expected — took 56% of games against 50% expected
7-6, 7-5
L
Octavian Tudorache / Anca Tudorachemixed
2026-03-22 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with James Carey
+0.000better than expected — took 46% of games against 38% expected
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
Michelle Gay / Lindsey Stafford
2026-03-14 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dianna Kaady
+0.026better than expected — took 80% of games against 62% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
Lindsey Yeung / Susan Wang
2026-03-07 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dianna Kaady
0.007about as expected — took 47% of games against 50% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
Molly Briscoe / Elisa Wickstrom
2026-02-01 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Virginia Welch
0.062below expectation — took 14% of games against 48% expected
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-01-24 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Molly Albright
+0.002about as expected — took 33% of games against 37% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Gina Mandel / Margaret Huff
2025-11-15 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dianna Kaady
+0.034better than expected — took 92% of games against 67% expected
6-0, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.