← Search

Janet Hummel

Forest Grove, OR
3.0A year-end 2025
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
56 matches · 9W–47L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Janet Hummel to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history56 matches
L
2026-07-11 · SAC-Hummel · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Gerald Snell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-24 · SAC-Hummel/McConachie · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Gerald Snell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-01-11 · SAC-Andersen/Hummel · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susie Lim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2025-11-22 · SAC-Koeberl · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Natasha Brady
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2025-10-19 · SAC-Koeberl · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jeane Anastas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2025-09-14 · SAC-Koeberl · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Natasha Brady
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2025-09-05 · SAC-Koeberl · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Natasha Brady
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-08-09 · SAC-Brady/Hummel · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dano Ehler mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
W
2025-08-02 · SAC-Brady/Hummel · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Paul Koenigsberg mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-06-21 · SAC-Hummel/Brady · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lori Andersen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2025-06-13 · SAC-Brady/Hummel · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Gerald Snell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
2025-05-25 · SAC-Hummel/Brady · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lori Farrell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
12.9%
4W–27L · 33.3% of games
6.0
25%
1W–3L · 30.8% of games
6.0mixed
10.5%
2W–17L · 32.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 43% of the time
#2 Doubles
43%
24 matches
#3 Doubles
43%
24 matches
#1 Doubles
14%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert