Search

Laura Rich

Portland, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
55 matches · 23W–32L · seasons 20192026
Where Laura sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Laura is one of 1173 women at 3.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 3.0 account for 30% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Laura has been a steady 3.0 across all 6 seasons on record.

2.53.0201920202022202320242025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Laura has gone from the 37th to the 17th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2024.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
3.0
42.6%
20W–27L · 48.3% of games
6.0
50%
3W–3L · 54% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history55 matches
L
Anne Walsh / Diane Nelson
2025-09-21 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mary Shackleton
0.016below expectation — took 25% of games against 38% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
2025-09-05 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Miwako Kobayashi
+0.007better than expected — took 80% of games against 68% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2025-02-02 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Tobin
0.035below expectation — took 48% of games against 61% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
Michelle Gay / Erin Legg
2025-01-05 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Tobin
+0.041better than expected — took 71% of games against 49% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
2025-01-04 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jeny Joseph
+0.018about as expected — took 44% of games against 40% expected
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W
2024-11-24 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Shuping Li
0.011about as expected — took 67% of games against 66% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
2024-11-16 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mary Shackleton
+0.015below expectation — took 20% of games against 25% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
2024-11-08 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Shuping Li
+0.033better than expected — took 92% of games against 67% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
Leslee Schonert / Jan Rimerman
2024-09-20 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Evelyne Cassell
0.014below expectation — took 48% of games against 53% expected
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L
2024-06-15 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alice Holland
+0.005about as expected — took 45% of games against 44% expected
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2024-06-09 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Janice Kuo
0.018below expectation — took 38% of games against 47% expected
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
L
Ilona Vondolovski / Molly Albright - *
2024-04-27 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Evelyne Cassell
0.026below expectation — took 40% of games against 52% expected
6-4, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.