Search

Dianna Kaady

Happy Valley, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
71 matches · 35W–36L · seasons 20222026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.99
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 13 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
55%
stay 3.0
45%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 87% stay · 13% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.91. Lower than today’s 2.99 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Happy Valley · 3.0
2 of 8
OR · 3.0
136 of 600

Dianna is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Dianna has been 3.0 for all 5 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

2.53.020222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2022 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Dianna has gone from the 35th to the 66th percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.0
47.8%
22W–24L · 50.1% of games
6.0
100%
7W–0L · 71.4% of games
7.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
40%
4W–6L · 53% of games
7.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 45.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history71 matches
W
Sharon Wise / Erika Anderson
2026-06-07 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cordelia Tilghman
+0.029better than expected — took 86% of games against 64% expected
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-05-03 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Molly Albright
0.006about as expected — took 43% of games against 46% expected
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-05-02 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Paull Kaady
+0.000about as expected — took 48% of games against 47% expected
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-04-19 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Paull Kaady
+0.000below expectation — took 33% of games against 50% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Emily James / Martha Tolentino
2026-03-27 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hilary Johnson
0.013about as expected — took 50% of games against 54% expected
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
Michelle Gay / Lindsey Stafford
2026-03-14 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ilona Vondolovski
+0.026better than expected — took 80% of games against 62% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
Lindsey Yeung / Susan Wang
2026-03-07 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ilona Vondolovski
0.007about as expected — took 47% of games against 50% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
Erin Nunn / Nicole Kennely
2026-02-21 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Paddy McShane
+0.026better than expected — took 75% of games against 59% expected
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-01-03 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dar Dragoon
0.020below expectation — took 29% of games against 42% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
Gina Mandel / Margaret Huff
2025-11-15 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ilona Vondolovski
+0.034better than expected — took 92% of games against 67% expected
6-0, 6-1
W
Jane Crisan / Frances Phillips
2025-11-09 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Claire C Gates
+0.017better than expected — took 86% of games against 68% expected
6-0, 6-2
W
2025-10-25 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kimbra Kasch
+0.013better than expected — took 71% of games against 60% expected
6-2, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.